DeepSeek vs Qwen - Coding Prompts #aiprogramming

Votre vidéo commence dans 10
Passer (5)
Formation gratuite en FR pour les membres inscrits sur les sites de vidéos

Merci ! Partagez avec vos amis !

Vous avez aimé cette vidéo, merci de votre vote !

Ajoutées by admin
13 Vues
Comparison between two powerful AI models—DeepSeek and Qwen —focusing specifically on their performance with coding prompts.
Whether you're a developer looking for the best tool to generate code or just curious about how these models stack up, this review has got you covered!

Key Takeaways:
For simple code generation , DeepSeek scores an impressive 8/10 , while Qwen lags slightly behind at 6/10 .
File Upload Limitations : One downside of Qwen is that it only allows uploading HTML files, whereas DeepSeek offers more flexibility.

Speed : Code generation in Qwen tends to be slower compared to DeepSeek.
When tackling tricky open-ended questions , Qwen shines with a consistent score of 7.5/10 , outperforming DeepSeek, which hovers around 7/10 at best.

Final Verdict :
If your primary focus is code generation , DeepSeek is the clear winner. However, if you're working on research-oriented tasks , detailed problem-solving , or high-level writing , Qwen might be the better choice.

Which one would I choose?
Given the choice between these two models, I’d lean towards DeepSeek for coding and Qwen for research and complex queries .
Catégories
prompts ia
Mots-clés
AI Comparison Prompts DeepSeek Qwen

Ajouter un commentaire

Commentaires

Soyez le premier à commenter cette vidéo.